<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Vulnerability-Analysis on CuraSec</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/vulnerability-analysis/</link><description>Recent content in Vulnerability-Analysis on CuraSec</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 14:29:02 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/vulnerability-analysis/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>SANS ISC Questions Reliability of php2shell Exploitability</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-10-24-reliable-x3f-php2shell-exploitability-fri-oct-23rd/</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 14:29:02 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-10-24-reliable-x3f-php2shell-exploitability-fri-oct-23rd/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Engineer — Learn:&lt;/strong> The SANS ISC diary questions whether the php2shell vulnerability hype was warranted — worth reading to calibrate response before committing patch resources, since no KEV listing or public PoC corroborates active exploitation.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>SOC/IR — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item></channel></rss>