<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Vendor-Research on CuraSec</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/vendor-research/</link><description>Recent content in Vendor-Research on CuraSec</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 11:39:11 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/vendor-research/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Benchmaxxing: Gaming Security Benchmarks as an Attack Target</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-08-20-benchmaxxing-when-the-benchmark-becomes-the-target/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 11:39:11 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-08-20-benchmaxxing-when-the-benchmark-becomes-the-target/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Engineer — Learn:&lt;/strong> No summary is available, so depth is uncertain, but the concept of benchmark-targeted optimization is worth reading if it covers how security tooling evaluations or AI-assisted security features can be gamed — no immediate patch or config action implied.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>SOC/IR — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Learn:&lt;/strong> If the piece substantiates how security product benchmarks can be manipulated, it informs more rigorous vendor evaluation criteria — relevant for procurement decisions, but no same-week action warranted without a richer summary.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item></channel></rss>