<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Trust on CuraSec</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/trust/</link><description>Recent content in Trust on CuraSec</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 13:10:29 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/trust/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Study: Practitioner Trust in Software Supply Chain Is Eroding</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-08-24-the-rising-cost-of-trust-practitioners-trust-signals-control/</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 13:10:29 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-08-24-the-rising-cost-of-trust-practitioners-trust-signals-control/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Engineer — Learn:&lt;/strong> Qualitative research on how practitioners actually respond to supply-chain trust erosion — automation, trust delegation, and guardian models — offers conceptual framing useful when designing SBOM, dependency-review, or artifact-signing workflows, but requires no immediate action.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>SOC/IR — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Learn:&lt;/strong> The finding that trust costs are rising and practitioners are accumulating controls is relevant context for board-level conversations about supply-chain risk investment, though the study offers no regulatory deadlines or vendor-specific exposure to act on now.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item></channel></rss>