<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Smart-Contracts on CuraSec</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/smart-contracts/</link><description>Recent content in Smart-Contracts on CuraSec</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 13:03:16 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/smart-contracts/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>DeFi Audit Scope Gap: 67.6% of H1 2026 Attack Paths Outside Audit Coverage</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-08-17-the-ack3-h1-2026-defi-incident-dataset-audit-scope-across-13/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 13:03:16 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-08-17-the-ack3-h1-2026-defi-incident-dataset-audit-scope-across-13/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Engineer — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>SOC/IR — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Learn:&lt;/strong> Research across 135 DeFi incidents shows that the &amp;lsquo;audited&amp;rsquo; label routinely overstates project-wide assurance — 67.6% of attack paths fell outside all identified pre-incident audit scopes. Useful context when evaluating what your own audit attestations actually cover in board or customer conversations.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item><item><title>Transaction Simulation Phishing Bypasses Crypto Wallet Defenses</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-08-03-blockchain-transaction-simulation-phishing/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 15:12:30 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-08-03-blockchain-transaction-simulation-phishing/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Engineer — Learn:&lt;/strong> Novel attack class showing how state-dependent smart contracts can make malicious transactions appear benign during wallet simulation previews; relevant for teams building Web3 integrations or DeFi applications, but no patch or configuration action is available for typical enterprise stacks.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>SOC/IR — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item><item><title>LLM + Code Slicing for NFT Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-07-27-ethereum-nft-smart-contracts-knowledge-guided-vulnerability/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 15:10:27 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-07-27-ethereum-nft-smart-contracts-knowledge-guided-vulnerability/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Engineer — Learn:&lt;/strong> Interesting research combining code slicing with LLM analysis to detect reentrancy and overflow in ERC-721 contracts, but no tooling release or actionable change to running systems today.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>SOC/IR — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item><item><title>KASS: Multi-Agent Framework Automates Smart Contract Exploit Generation</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-07-20-beyond-detection-agentic-attack-synthesis-and-simulation-for/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:31:24 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-07-20-beyond-detection-agentic-attack-synthesis-and-simulation-for/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Engineer — Learn:&lt;/strong> Research demonstrates a multi-agent pipeline that auto-generates executable exploits for 94% of tested smart contracts, a meaningful capability jump over prior tools; worth evaluating if your team ships or audits Solidity code, but no running-system action needed today.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>SOC/IR — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item></channel></rss>