<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Prompt-Engineering on CuraSec</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/prompt-engineering/</link><description>Recent content in Prompt-Engineering on CuraSec</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:31:24 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/prompt-engineering/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Prompt syntax shapes secure code output in open LLMs</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-07-20-the-language-of-security-how-prompt-syntax-shapes-secure-cod/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:31:24 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-07-20-the-language-of-security-how-prompt-syntax-shapes-secure-cod/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Engineer — Learn:&lt;/strong> Research shows specific syntactic elements (constraints, guards, conditions) placed in prompts consistently reduce insecure code generation from open LLMs — useful input for teams building internal coding assistants or prompt templates for developer tooling.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>SOC/IR — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item></channel></rss>