<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Mpc on CuraSec</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/mpc/</link><description>Recent content in Mpc on CuraSec</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 19:07:02 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/mpc/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Flawed Noise Sampling Breaks Differential Privacy in MPC Systems</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-08-31-revisiting-continuous-noise-sampling-for-multi-party-differe/</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 19:07:02 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-08-31-revisiting-continuous-noise-sampling-for-multi-party-differe/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Engineer — Learn:&lt;/strong> The paper exposes a fundamental flaw in sample-and-scale DP noise protocols, achieving near-100% membership-inference success against Orchard and DP-BREM+; engineers building federated analytics or DP aggregation pipelines should audit whether their noise-sampling implementation uses the vulnerable scaling approach.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>SOC/IR — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item></channel></rss>