<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Llm-Safety on CuraSec</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/llm-safety/</link><description>Recent content in Llm-Safety on CuraSec</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 18:39:19 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/llm-safety/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Omni-UBench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLM Guardrail Safety and Gaps</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-10-26-omni-ubench-benchmarking-omni-modal-llm-based-guardrails-acr/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 18:39:19 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-10-26-omni-ubench-benchmarking-omni-modal-llm-based-guardrails-acr/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Engineer — Learn:&lt;/strong> If you deploy LLM-based content moderation or safety guardrails, this research documents concrete failure modes — cross-modal jailbreaks and safety hallucinations — that should inform how you evaluate and layer your guardrail stack.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>SOC/IR — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Learn:&lt;/strong> Research showing current omni-modal guardrails systematically fail on cross-modal inputs is relevant context for AI governance policy and vendor due diligence if your org deploys or procures LLM-based safety filters.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item><item><title>RiskCueBench: LLM Safety Miscalibration via Prompt Specificity</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-10-19-recoverability-controlled-safety-miscalibration-in-large-lan/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 18:41:36 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-10-19-recoverability-controlled-safety-miscalibration-in-large-lan/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Engineer — Learn:&lt;/strong> If you deploy LLMs as application components, this research shows safety evaluations conditioned only on final response can mask real unsafe behavior — consider adding recoverability-controlled testing to your AI red-teaming process.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>SOC/IR — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Learn:&lt;/strong> Academic benchmark finding that LLM safety alignment can be surface-form-dependent is useful context for evaluating vendor safety claims if your organization deploys AI models, but requires no immediate action.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item></channel></rss>