<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Information-Disclosure on CuraSec</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/information-disclosure/</link><description>Recent content in Information-Disclosure on CuraSec</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 16:34:51 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/information-disclosure/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>OpenAI Compaction Flaw Exposes Hidden Reasoning in Plain Text</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-10-27-openai-compaction-flaw-let-researchers-bypass-hidden-reasoni/</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 16:34:51 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-10-27-openai-compaction-flaw-let-researchers-bypass-hidden-reasoni/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Engineer — Learn:&lt;/strong> If you integrate OpenAI reasoning models and rely on encrypted reasoning confidentiality as a security boundary, this research shows that boundary is breakable via compaction; no patch details or CVE are present yet, so no action is required today, but re-evaluate any architecture that treats hidden reasoning as a trust control.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>SOC/IR — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Learn:&lt;/strong> This research challenges the assumption that OpenAI&amp;rsquo;s reasoning-model privacy controls are reliable; worth noting if your company depends on reasoning confidentiality as a data-handling guarantee, but no incident or regulatory trigger is present yet.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item></channel></rss>