<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Industry-Opinion on CuraSec</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/industry-opinion/</link><description>Recent content in Industry-Opinion on CuraSec</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:43:35 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/industry-opinion/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Opinion: Vulnerability research is broken as a field</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-07-21-vulnerability-research-is-cooked/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:43:35 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-07-21-vulnerability-research-is-cooked/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Engineer — Learn:&lt;/strong> A high-signal HN discussion (267 points) on the structural dysfunction in vuln research is worth reading to calibrate how much weight to give CVE feeds and vendor advisories.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>SOC/IR — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Learn:&lt;/strong> Industry critique of vulnerability research incentives is relevant background for evaluating how your team prioritizes CVE-driven work and what that means for your risk posture.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item></channel></rss>