<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Gitlab-Rce on CuraSec</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/gitlab-rce/</link><description>Recent content in Gitlab-Rce on CuraSec</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2026 17:05:59 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/gitlab-rce/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Alpine Linux rebuilds GitLab after attempted RCE attack</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-11-01-alpine-linux-rebuilds-gitlab-after-attempted-rce-attack/</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2026 17:05:59 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-11-01-alpine-linux-rebuilds-gitlab-after-attempted-rce-attack/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Engineer — Act:&lt;/strong> Any self-hosted GitLab instance should be verified as fully patched against the exploited critical CVE; engineers using Alpine Linux as a base image should flag builds from around Oct 20–21 for review pending Alpine&amp;rsquo;s confirmation that no source or package tampering occurred.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>SOC/IR — Act:&lt;/strong> Review GitLab server logs for RCE exploitation attempts around Oct 20–21; if Alpine Linux packages feed your build pipeline, treat artifacts from that window as potentially suspect and initiate a precautionary sweep until Alpine issues a clean bill of health.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Plan:&lt;/strong> Alpine&amp;rsquo;s build infrastructure may have been compromised — confirm this quarter whether development teams rely on Alpine base images or packages, and establish a posture for responding to potential supply chain contamination if Alpine confirms a breach.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item></channel></rss>