<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Gartner on CuraSec</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/gartner/</link><description>Recent content in Gartner on CuraSec</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2026 18:24:39 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/gartner/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Gartner Framework: 4 Elements of Exposure Prioritization</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-11-03-the-4-elements-of-exposure-prioritization-and-how-to-operati/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2026 18:24:39 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-11-03-the-4-elements-of-exposure-prioritization-and-how-to-operati/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Engineer — Learn:&lt;/strong> The Gartner statistic that fewer than 10% of vulnerabilities are ever exploited reinforces using EPSS/KEV signals to focus patch effort; no immediate system change required, but worth reviewing your team&amp;rsquo;s current prioritization criteria against this framework.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>SOC/IR — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Learn:&lt;/strong> Gartner&amp;rsquo;s finding that most teams over-remediate low-risk exposures while higher-risk ones queue up is useful benchmarking data for board or budget conversations about risk-based remediation programs.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item></channel></rss>