<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Embedded-Security on CuraSec</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/embedded-security/</link><description>Recent content in Embedded-Security on CuraSec</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 11:49:48 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/embedded-security/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Six U-Boot Bootloader Flaws Enable Stealthy Firmware Attacks</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-07-11-new-u-boot-flaws-could-enable-stealthy-firmware-attacks/</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 11:49:48 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-07-11-new-u-boot-flaws-could-enable-stealthy-firmware-attacks/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Engineer — Plan:&lt;/strong> Engineers running IoT devices, network appliances, or embedded Linux hardware using U-Boot should audit their device inventory and prioritize firmware updates when vendor patches are released; no public PoC or active exploitation means no immediate urgency, but firmware persistence is hard to remediate after compromise.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>SOC/IR — Learn:&lt;/strong> No IOCs, no active exploitation, and no current detection surface — these vulnerabilities illustrate how boot-level compromise can bypass OS-layer controls, worth understanding for future firmware-focused threat hunting frameworks.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item></channel></rss>