<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Cyber-Physical on CuraSec</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/cyber-physical/</link><description>Recent content in Cyber-Physical on CuraSec</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 21:42:19 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/cyber-physical/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Cyber-to-Physical Propagation Framework for Water Infrastructure Security</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-11-02-closing-the-applied-cybersecurity-gap-in-critical-infrastruc/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 21:42:19 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-11-02-closing-the-applied-cybersecurity-gap-in-critical-infrastruc/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Engineer — Learn:&lt;/strong> Introduces the Cyber-to-Physical Propagation Rate metric as a way to model how cyber compromise translates to physical service impact in OT networks — useful for engineers designing security architecture for water or similar critical infrastructure, but requires no change to running systems.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>SOC/IR — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Learn:&lt;/strong> The ACGI/CPPR framework offers a quantitative basis for communicating cyber-to-physical risk in OT environments to boards and regulators; useful background for leaders accountable for critical infrastructure, but no immediate action required.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item></channel></rss>