tag: Compliance · 7 items
- Engineer — Plan: Engineers operating FedRAMP-authorized systems should audit their current scan cadence and evidence workflows against the new VDR/VER requirements before the December 7 deadline — daily scanning and tighter remediation documentation will likely require tooling or process changes.
- SOC/IR — Skip
- Leader — Plan: If your organization holds or is pursuing a FedRAMP authorization, confirm with your compliance team whether the December 7 VDR/VER deadline requires updated scanning contracts, tooling investment, or changes to your remediation SLAs before the next audit cycle.
- Engineer — Skip
- SOC/IR — Learn: DORA’s second year shifts focus from paperwork to whether detection and logging actually meet operational resilience requirements — useful framing for assessing current coverage gaps against regulatory expectations, but no IOCs or specific detection actions are provided.
- Leader — Plan: EU financial entities subject to DORA should use this moment to formally assess whether SOC visibility and incident detection capabilities meet year-two operational expectations; consider scheduling a gap review against DORA’s threat intelligence and ICT incident reporting requirements before year-end.
- Engineer — Skip
- SOC/IR — Skip
- Leader — Plan: CJIS v6.1 raises the bar on encryption, MFA, and vulnerability scanning for covered agencies and their technology vendors; leaders at CJIS-regulated organizations should review the updated requirements against current controls and schedule an internal gap assessment before the next audit cycle.
- Engineer — Plan: Software vendors shipping into the EU must have accurate SBOMs and timestamped vulnerability discovery records to meet the 24-hour exploitation-reporting window; audit your bill-of-materials completeness and disclosure tracking processes against the September 11 deadline.
- SOC/IR — Skip
- Leader — Act: EU CRA vulnerability reporting requirements take effect September 11 — if your company ships software to EU customers, confirm this week whether you qualify under the act and that your disclosure and legal teams have a process to meet the 24-hour reporting window for actively exploited flaws.
- Engineer — Skip
- SOC/IR — Skip
- Leader — Learn: A publicly available SOC 2 readiness framework with controls, criteria, and evidence standards; useful as a benchmarking reference when preparing for or reviewing audit posture.
- Engineer — Plan: If your team supports a FedRAMP-authorized product, start mapping how you’ll generate continuous, machine-readable control evidence — point-in-time assessment artifacts will no longer suffice once the transition deadline arrives.
- SOC/IR — Skip
- Leader — Plan: If your organization holds or pursues FedRAMP authorization, place the Rev5-to-20x transition on the roadmap this quarter: budget for tooling that produces continuous evidence and assess your current ATO timeline against the sunset date. Note this piece appears to be vendor-authored content from Anecdotes, so verify transition specifics against GSA primary sources.
- Engineer — Plan: If you operate in a HIPAA-covered environment, review the updated Security Rule requirements this quarter and identify any new technical safeguards or control gaps to address before enforcement deadlines.
- SOC/IR — Skip
- Leader — Act: Healthcare or health-data leaders should read the updated rule now, map changes to your current compliance posture, and brief legal/compliance on any new obligations or deadline-driven gaps before they surface in your next audit.