<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Cloud-Native on CuraSec</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/cloud-native/</link><description>Recent content in Cloud-Native on CuraSec</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 19:07:02 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/tags/cloud-native/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Systematic Review: eBPF Security Mechanisms Across 54 Studies (2018-2026)</title><link>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-08-31-ebpf-based-cybersecurity-mechanisms-a-systematic-literature/</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 19:07:02 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curasec.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-08-31-ebpf-based-cybersecurity-mechanisms-a-systematic-literature/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Engineer — Learn:&lt;/strong> A thorough taxonomy of eBPF security applications across DDoS, container, and microservice domains with benchmarked overhead (median 2.4% CPU); useful for evaluating eBPF-based tooling or informing system design, but the notable finding that 96.2% of surveyed research ignores eBPF&amp;rsquo;s own attack surface is worth factoring into adoption decisions.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>SOC/IR — Learn:&lt;/strong> Provides a structured overview of eBPF&amp;rsquo;s role in intrusion detection and real-time packet inspection with high reported accuracy (94-99%), which is useful background when evaluating eBPF-backed EDR or detection tools, though there are no actionable IOCs or detection content here.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item></channel></rss>